Jessie Jackson gives a new definition to "foot in mouth" syndrome
I have to admit that when I first saw the clip of Rev. Jesse Jackson exposing his ‘ghetto side,’ I laughed so hard I nearly peed myself. Damn, you better watch when those mics are on, son! Obviously not a whole lotta people thought it was funny as I thought it was.
I don’t know if it was political posturing by media pundits, but a lot of people were pissed. But why? I thought that based on the public response on Jackson’s public gaffe, there is something that no one – especially the guest commentators on CNN or Michael Eric Dyson on NBC’s Today Show bothered to mention – or maybe didn’t want to raise it publicly, that was that maybe Jackson has a right to be (privately) pissed at Obama’s speech on black fatherhood. No, not because he’s playa hatin’ or anything like that, but because his message – which I agreed with, btw – was aired in such a public manner. Yes, black folks – actually everyone needed to hear some of the truths Obama spoke, but I think that Jackson was (is?) pissed for two reasons:
1) He said what white folks wanted to hear him say. Look, Obama can’t please everyone. As the first African-American presidential candidate who has a snowballs chance in actually winning, he’s screwed. He has to appease white people who are scared of black folks and are wary of voting for a Negro, and he has to show black folks that he is still ‘down with the brown,’ despite being a representative for all Americans. He also has to win over Latinos, Asians, Clinton supporters, white so-called ‘’liberal” feminists…anyone who is wary of his policies, his so-called ‘lack of experience,’ and still (for the love of Christ, people) think he is a Muslim.
Also, the fear of having a strong, fine Sista as a potential First Lady is enough to make people doubtful of having a brother in the White House. An Obama candidacy cannot transcend race or racism, let’s get real, y’all. When Obama talks about black parenting, fatherlessness, welfare and the ails of black people in general, to some it seems like he is pandering to the demographic of people who say/think “If only those people would……..” And to some extent that was what I initially thought, that it was pandering to the same people that feel that black racism does not really exist, that if something happens it is our fault. “If only they would get a job, stop having children out of wedlock and act as we do, there would be no problems.........My ancestors weren’t slave owners.” Also, as much as some folks (like in every cultural / entho-graphic population) do perpetuate some of the social situations Obama was discussing, not all of us do. I am not sure of many things in life, but I am pretty sure that there are a whole lotta people who think that black folks are a monolithic group.
We are all the same and we all have propensity to get into some sort of trouble. And those of us that don’t – the very few of us, that is – well, we don’t know our place. We are uppity, think we are ‘better’ and need to be taken down a notch or two. Because of several generations of passed down self-hate and insecurity about our rightful presence in North America, we all feel some sort of responsibility. So when Obama airs our dirty laundry (just like Bill Cosby), it feels like he as exposed an issue that should be taken place behind closed doors.
2) Who the hell is this Negro? A bi-racial, rich, successful, not even really African-American man has the nerve to be spilling our mess…….in a black church…..in front of a television camera…..on Father’s Day? Who the fuck does he think he is, that trifling motherfucker? Obama probably got more people to listen to him than in all the years that Jackson, Rev. Al Sharpton, Bill Cosby and any other so-called ‘black leaders’ have essentially been saying the same thing. And while the furor about his racial identity has calmed down a bit, there is that question of, is he really black? Unfortunately, one of the most insidious but easiest insults used to disparage black folks by black folks is to question their authenticity.
Any time Obama screws up, says or does things that make people think twice about their blind allegiance to his candidacy, they will pull this one out. And while in some ways, people might be legitimately salty because of his social and economic stature (similar to the misgivings about Cosby) his own story – his father wasn’t around and he was raised by his mother’s parents – do add to his legitimacy to let it all hang out. People just conveniently ignore that part of his story. Why? I dunno. Maybe because of self-determination, intelligence and a whole lotta good luck, people would rather be envious than look at his personal background as something to be emulated and proud of. Who knows?
I was talking to my sorta-boss about this today and she said that what bothered her was the media’s constant coverage of Obama that insinuated a tension between him and other blacks. What admires her about Obama is that he signifies how far America has come in terms of accepting the diversity of their country, yet the media is always trying to throw a wrench into that progress. And she is right. After all, why would anyone leak the clip of Jackson if they weren’t trying to prove a point?
The last year and so have been exciting, disappointing and a real dose of reality in terms of race relations in North America. I hope Obama wins the presidency, but I also know that there is a whole lotta bullshit to come.




